My friend and advisor Sam Sommers recently published a post on his blog “Science of Small Talk” on the “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” Facebook group. His post examines how political correctness has become a pejorative term and why that seems misguided (and also whether the idea of opposing PC-ness has any bearing on the religious responses to the SouthPark/Facebook frenzy). It’s much more complicated than I am going to describe here – but I encourage you to read the whole post.
An excerpt:
…After all, [political correctness] comes from a good place with good intention to which most of us would subscribe: to make sure that all people feel comfortable and even valued. It doesn’t seem like such a terrible thing to err on that side of caution much of the time.
We live in a far more open, tolerant, and equitable society today than people did 50 years ago. The flat-out rejection and demonization of political correctness strikes me as a repudiation of much of this progress.
It is, for Muslims, incredibly offensive to try to portray the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) in any way. Christians tend to not understand this, because there is a long historical tradition in Christian art of portraying Jesus the Christ and pretty much everyone associated with Him. (And often His Holiness Christ is portrayed with seriously Eurocentric features, but I’ll save that discussion for the essay I’m working on for the Mirror of Race website.) So for people coming from a Christian/ western understanding of the world, it’s an issue of free speech and common practice. For people coming from a Muslim religious background, it’s just ineffably horrifying.
Anyway, usually I’d chalk it up to old frameworks and lack of cross-cultural understanding and willingness to take perspective, etc, but I caught a fragment of a news story that this whole Facebook thing (and probably some other motivating factors) has led the government of Pakistan to place a ban on Facebook. And Youtube, Flickr, etc. Now this has gotten political – and because of my sister’s current residence, personal. So I thought I’d explore this a bit.
My interest is in framing this at a more personal level. In essence, what’s taking place here is: If A does something which offends B horribly, and A feels B’s response is inappropriate, then A will keep doing that offensive act, because A deems it important to exercise A’s right to free speech. Meanwhile, B gets frustrated and furious in response to what feels like a direct attack in utter disregard of all B holds sacred.
To look at this only in terms of free speech is to come at it from an individualistic framework. It is certainly clear that American culture and institutions value the right of the individual to self-expression. Cultural psychologists have been making this point for decades. In this case the prioritization of the individual (A) above all else is clear. But it isn’t everything.
The response (B) is coming from a deeply held religious belief about the offensiveness of a certain form of that expression – and unfortunately sometimes this is transmuted into calls for violence. The reactionary nature of that type of response – to shut down communication, or go on the attack – is truly harmful, and suggests a lack of faith in human nobility/ integrity.
Either way, I think we can do better. I honestly believe we as a human race are more mature than this – or at least capable of more maturity. For Baha’is, this issue is placed in the context of humanity’s relationship with God. The Universal House of Justice explains:
“The prohibition on representing the Manifestation of God in paintings and drawings or in dramatic presentations applies to all the Manifestations of God. There are, of course, great and wonderful works of art of past Dispensations, many of which portrayed the Manifestations of God in a spirit of reverence and love. In this Dispensation however the greater maturity of mankind and the greater awareness of the relationship between the Supreme Manifestation and His servants enable us to realize the impossibility of representing, in any human form, whether pictorially, in sculpture or dramatic representation, the Person of God’s Manifestations.”
More on maturity later…